Trump’s Removal of Special Counsel Declared Unlawful

Federal judge rules against President’s authority to terminate Dellinger.

Topic: US News

by MPeriod

Posted 9 months ago


Trump’s Attempt to Fire Special Counsel Ruled Unlawful

Key Points Covered:

  • Federal judge declared Trump's actions unlawful.
  • Hampton Dellinger remains the head of the Office of Special Counsel.
  • Potential Supreme Court battle anticipated.

Overview

A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled that President Donald Trump’s attempt to remove Hampton Dellinger from the Office of Special Counsel was unlawful. This decision is expected to lead to a possible appeal to the Supreme Court.

Details of the Ruling

Judge Amy Berman Jackson emphasized the importance of the Special Counsel's role, stating, “The Special Counsel’s job is to look into and expose unethical or unlawful practices directed at federal civil servants.” She noted that allowing arbitrary removal could undermine the office’s effectiveness in protecting whistleblowers.

Background

Last month, Trump fired Dellinger via email while implementing cuts to the federal workforce, which included the dismissal of other government watchdogs. Dellinger contested his termination, citing a federal law stating that special counsels can only be removed under specific circumstances.

Hampton Dellinger’s Response

Dellinger’s lawsuit highlighted the lack of justification in Trump’s email termination, which merely stated his position was “terminated, effective immediately.” Following this, Judge Jackson issued a stay to prevent Dellinger’s removal while the case was ongoing.

Legal Proceedings

After a lower court sided with Dellinger, the Trump administration appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which upheld the ruling with a 2-1 vote. The Justice Department argued that preventing Trump from managing the executive branch could harm the presidency.

Implications

Dellinger, appointed by President Joe Biden in March 2024, is responsible for protecting federal employees from illegal practices, including retaliatory actions against whistleblowers. He expressed concerns over the independence of his position, stating that fear of arbitrary removal would discourage federal employees from coming forward.

Next Steps

The White House has not commented yet, but the Trump administration has filed a notice of appeal following the judge’s ruling.


Please Login/Join To Respond

Terms & Conditions     Privacy Policy
People's Pulpit X/Twitter Page     People's Pulpit Facebook Page     People's Pulpit Youtube Channel     People's Pulpit Instagram Page
Subscribe To Mailing List